Conservative Ann Coulter tweeted:
If libertarian attacks on cops had any purpose other than getting liberals to like them, once in awhile, they’d mention a TSA agent
my favorite response was actually from another conservative, NR writer Charles Cooke, who replied
What can this tweet mean?
The Warren Report: Fact or Fiction?
Mark Lane on Firing Line with William F. Buckley, Jr.
(as you might have guessed, CIA man WFB supplies the fiction)
Too many libertarians sound like libertines, but I guess that’s the logical outcome of moral relativism…
When that interview said “this isn’t the first time your brother has been captured” and they both are like HAAAAAAAAAAAH YEAAAAAH
I don’t understand this at all. I don’t remember Michael Brown’s family laughing during their interviews. Come to think of it, I can’t really think of anybody laughing when being asked about the brutal death of a loved one.
this is too weird
*looks around empty room* *speaks loudly into tv speakers* OKAY I’D LIKE YOU TO LEAVE ME ALONE. I’M NOT INTERESTED IN THIS AND I’D LIKE TO JUST FORGET ABOUT IT NOW.
what the fuck haha
one of those videos about Foley’s “siblings” was called “can it get any more ridiculous?”
and during the interview a picture falls off the wall in the background “AND THEY DON’T EVEN BUDGE!” laughed the narrator
What do the Sandy Hoax lone gunman (alleged) Adam Lanza’s class-mate and ISIS beheading victim (so they say) James Foley’s sister have in common? Wait for it ………Wait for it ………..
They are one the same!
Haven’t researched this but I am reblogging to remind myself to look into it later. Looks like a huge find.
Their speech patterns do sound similar
What the hell I’m watching that interview right now where these two are being asked about their brother’s being kidnapped and beheaded and they have the demeanor of two people being interviewed for some human interest story. Their laughing and smiles when asked about how many times James had been kidnapped were like they had been asked “so, what’s it like growing Kansas’ largest pumpkin?”
This is too bizarre.
Also another video is claiming the dude above is elliot rodger?
On the one hand I find this kind of conspiracy theory to be absolutely absurd and ridiculous. On the other hand there was this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_(testimony) which is acknowledged to have actually happened and is essentially the same kind of thing
Lysander Spooner, portrait of words
It is true that the theory of our Constitution is, that all taxes are paid voluntarily; that our government is a mutual insurance company, voluntarily entered into by the people with each other… . But this theory of our government is wholly different from the practical fact. The fact is that the government, like a highwayman, says to a man: “Your money, or your life.” And many, if not most, taxes are paid under the compulsion of that threat. The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon him from the roadside, and, holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets. But the robbery is none the less a robbery on that account; and it is far more dastardly and shameful. The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger, and crime of his own act. He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to use it for your own benefit. He does not pretend to be anything but a robber. He has not acquired impudence enough to profess to be merely a “protector,” and that he takes men’s money against their will, merely to enable him to “protect” those infatuated travellers, who feel perfectly able to protect themselves, or do not appreciate his peculiar system of protection. He is too sensible a man to make such professions as these. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful “sovereign,” on account of the “protection” he affords you. He does not keep “protecting” you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. He is too much of a gentleman to be guilty of such impostures, and insults, and villainies as these. In short, he does not, in addition to robbing you, attempt to make you either his dupe or his slave.
Someone in Juarez wants to move to El Paso. They have an employer lined up who is willing to pay them, and they’ve found someone willing to rent them a house.
How is this any of your god damn business?
Why on earth would anyone want this?
This is such a know-nothing conservative thing to say.
"See that awful thing over there? Why can’t ‘we’ direct it against this thing I don’t like?"
Yes, by all means. Let ‘us’ spend billions putting armored vehicles and an army on ‘the border’ (presumably there’s only one now?) hmmm I wonder which border you mean…
That’s just what should be done. Let ‘us’ bombard, harass, attack, and generally make war upon people for daring to live somewhere the conservatives don’t want them to be.
as a kid I can remember going to blockbuster and renting multiple seasons of In Loving Color
but I can’t remember how I decided i needed to do that